Pesachim 83a-b

April 10, 2006

This month's Steinsaltz Daf Yomi is sponsored by:
Dr. and Mrs. Alan Harris
The Lewy Family Foundation
Marilyn and Edward Kaplan

To dedicate future editions of Steinsaltz Daf Yomi,
perhaps in honor of a special occasion or in memory of a loved one, click here

NEW! Visit our Daf Live discussion forum
to share your thoughts and questions on Rabbi Steinsaltz's essays
 and to connect with others studying Daf Yomi.

*  *  *

The Torah teaches (Shmot 12:10) that we are commanded to burn the notar, i.e. any meat that is left over from the korban Pesach. The Mishnah on our daf (=page) teaches that this notar is not burned on Yom Tov, nor is it burned on Shabbat, so if the first day of Pesach is on a Friday, the notar would not be destroyed until Sunday.
Aside from the edible meat that was left over, the Mishnah teaches about two other parts of the animal that need to be burnt ? the bones and the gid ha-nasheh.
The bones of the korban Pesach cannot be broken (see Shmot 12:46) so, by definition, there will be edible marrow left within them that will be considered notar and will have to be destroyed.
The gid ha-nasheh is a sinew in the animal's hind-quarters that is forbidden by the Torah based on Ya'akov's injury after wrestling with the angel (see Bereshit 32:31-32). Since the gid itself is forbidden, the Gemara concludes that the Mishnah is talking about a part of the sinew that is permitted on a Biblical level and is forbidden as a Rabbinic ordinance.
The Sha'agat Aryeh (Rabbi Aryeh Leib Gunzberg) asks why the gid ha-nasheh of the korban Pesach would be forbidden at all. Based on the general principle that aseh doheh lo ta'aseh ? that a positive commandment will "push aside" a negative one, shouldn't the mitzvah of eating the korban Pesach override the prohibition of eating the gid ha-nasheh? One suggested answer is that the mitzvah forbidding the gid ha-nasheh was given even before the Torah was presented to the Jewish people on Mount Sinai, and therefore its rules are more stringent. The Sefat Emet suggests that this is an example of a case where the Sages chose to give added strength to one of their decrees, even in the face of a Biblical commandment.

This essay is based upon the insights and chidushim of Rabbi Steinsaltz, as published in the Hebrew version of the Steinsaltz Edition of the Talmud.  To learn more about the Steinsaltz Daf Yomi initiative, click here.

Any questions/comments on this essay?
Post your thoughts on our NEW 
Daf Live discussion forum!

Next: Pesachim 84a-b